Indian Famine Paradox
While reviewing excerpt from the History of British India vol.2 at the British Library, some important revelations emerge. We were taught that the British built the Indian railway system to develop trade. True but what is also true is they accelerated the work because they were shocked to witness the unimaginable death across the country from famines and natural disasters. They had not witnessed anything like this before. Collectively, the British and the intellectual natives, realized for the first time that the Mughals had simply looted the country and never invested in any developmental activities like building new methods of travel and transport.
Did you know that in 1899, 475,000 sq miles of India was prone to drought and 69,500,00 human lives were affected by it while only 6,500,000 could be provided relief? Imagine the colossal loss of life. Despite coming from the land of Aryabhatta, Patanjali, Brahmagupta, Charaka, Bhaskara, Kanada & Varahamihira we Indians were bereft of scientific thinking and approach. Beats me!
Gujrat has been a victim of natural calamity and probably the only other State that suffered as much after Bengal. The first natural Bengal famine occurred in 1770 when a third of the Bengal population perished which was close to 1 crore. Add genocide on Bengali existence plus the lives lost in freedom fight, there was no other community that suffered as much as Bengali's yet we kept producing the most brilliant minds in the world until the mid 1900s.
In 1631 a Dutch merchant went to Surat, Gujrat. He notes that 11 of the 260 families at Swally survived. He writes "the road thence to Surat covered with bodies decaying on the highway where they died, there being nobody to bury them. In Surat, a great crowded city, I could hardly see any living person but corpses at the corner of the streets lie twenty together, nobody burying them. 30,000 had perished in the town alone. This was in a manner the garden of the world is turned into wilderness".
Again in 1900 there was a massive cholera outbreak simultaneously in Panch Mahal District in Gujrat and Bundelkhand. The outcomes were dramatically different. More than 2 lakhs people died and the locals fled from Gujrat leaving a handful of British officers to clean up. A few British officers cremated lakhs of Indian who would otherwise have simply rotting on the streets of India. In Bundelkhand however, the Lieutenant Governor was able to train locals over 2 years on famine management. So when famine hit Bundelkhand, there was a structure and strategy in place to manage famine. Few handful of people died. This again proves that it was not always the British that were responsible for deaths of Indian. Sometimes it was our own idiosyncrasies that resulted in disasters.
Other States that faced the wrath of natural calamity were Rajasthan (Jaipur & Agra in 1838, 1861), Odisha (1866), Gujrat - Kutch (1861). In 1900, the Maharaja of Jaipur donated Rs. 16 lakhs for relief into a Government Securities fund. Other noblemen from the country also donated to this fund to take it to Rs. 30 lakhs in 1905 and was India's first Public Charitable Relief Fund.
The common narrative that, it was the British that caused famines, is not entirely true. While the Bengal famine of 1943 was completely man made and the person responsible was none other than the tyrant Churchill, major famines have been recorded in India between 1670 through 1880 (Turgot) until the Famine Commission was formed in 1880. Most of the famines between 1850-1880 were definitely man made either because the British government took too long to table the Famine Policy under a Famine Commission or Indians were busy with mutiny across the country. Most villagers and farmers were participating in the freedom movement thus had little focus on agriculture the monsoon cycles.
Thus there were 3 reasons famines occurs and how India fell victim to it over prolonged periods of time.
2) Lack of connectivity
3) Freedom struggle
The British realized that the only way to shield the people from nature's fury was to
1) Build storage facilities
2) Build a robust railways system that could transfer food to affected areas at speed and scale.
A slight deviation and an interesting story about the Sridhar Narayan Shaligram Sila. If you've read Blog 2 of 4, ancestors of Mukherjee's of Uttarpara were Kulin brahmin priests from the district of Phulia. Nilkantha Thakur had a vivid dream in the night and he was visited by Lord Narayan himself. In his dream he was asked to travel to Gandaki River in Nepal and collect a Sridhar Narayan Shaligram Sila and bring it to Phulia (West Bengal) and establish it as the kul devata for the Mukherjee's. In the 12th to 13th Century there were no other modes of transportation other horsebacks, bullock carts or walking on feet, mostly bare feet. Nilkantha Thakur walked from Phulia in West Bengal to Gandaki River in Nepal. which was about 1100 km of walking through dangerous terrain, to take possession of the Sila. The Sila was exactly where he saw in his dreams. Nilkantha Thakur brought it back to Phulia and then his successor Gopiraman brought it to Khamargachi.
In 1868 the first ever Famine Policy was drafted in India and it had 2 purposes
2) Fortify people against drought
On the topic of 1943 Famine you may like to read my post. You are very right otherwise in your analysis.
ReplyDeleteHere is the link
Delete